| Rankings were are you?? | |
|
+15ricky Donald Fraser CAPTAIN CAVEMAN Dean stan NickHall bubba2308 joanne KING EDWARD Anthony Pete terryackers Steve Kirlew dan paul maiden 19 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
paul maiden pro
Posts : 629 Join date : 2008-12-08
| Subject: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 9:52 | |
| these are not set in stone but examples of classes and such
-70s rogers ted dean baz chris shaw
-80s ham anil burnell sampson rambo murphy
90s craig kirlew preston barker green henderson
-100s dickenson hall donald ackers bubba day
supers marv greaves big ste charles bear ricketts
there not in order but examples of top 6 top 10 could be difficult to use in some classes but what we need now is a comittee to sort out the rankings chosen by the people before any rules are made like weighing inn in front of people etc which is a good idea...
i would say 1 person from each club voted in tho by the public
so eg bullets=anil freak shop= wilson bad boys=gary panthers=chris waters scotland=davey bedford=rambo powerbeck=baz cambridge=dan milton keynes=kirlew pulling power=dickenson swidon=cini
i no i missed one or two but that gives a indication of what we can do and all can be done threw the forum on chat and for people to see, form this and this is the foundations to building the house | |
|
| |
dan pro
Posts : 962 Join date : 2008-07-17 Age : 46 Location : Cambridge
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 10:47 | |
| I think a good starting point would be to use last years British championships to set the rankings rolling. This would mean I don't get ranked as with a lot of newer guys. And would have to challenge whoever is placed last to get myself going. In the case of running 10kg increments the order would need to be voted on from the list of all the guys that pulled in that bracket at the nationals. | |
|
| |
paul maiden pro
Posts : 629 Join date : 2008-12-08
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 12:04 | |
| It's difficult to use that way tho as 65 ted champ 70s baz there dean Ste in there to we would need run a comp to sort it out,the year is very busy from now and comps close together,panthers would be a good start but Germany is very close for the guys that go,unfortunate I am unable attend now due to family commitments :-(
Perhaps iron arm would be a good start???? | |
|
| |
paul maiden pro
Posts : 629 Join date : 2008-12-08
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 13:58 | |
| 70s 1.ted 2.baz 3.dean 4.rogers 5.waters 6.shaw -80s 1.craig 2.rambo 3.ham 4.ryan f 5.murphy 6.anil 7.sampson -90s 1.kirlew Barker left out due to being awol other wise spot number 1 2.hall 3.ackers 4.henderson 5.mitchel 6.waters -100s 1.maiden 2.pickup 3.hall 4.dickenson 5.bubba 6.thomas supers 1.big ste 2.marv 3.alan 4.ricketts 5.? 6.? right arm only these are as close as i can get them if iam honest or were i think it would be | |
|
| |
paul maiden pro
Posts : 629 Join date : 2008-12-08
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 15:07 | |
| From various pm Sampson gets a place | |
|
| |
Steve Kirlew pro
Posts : 527 Join date : 2009-11-15
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 15:43 | |
| - paul maiden wrote:
- 70s
1.ted 2.baz 3.dean 4.rogers 5.waters 6.shaw
-80s 1.craig 2.rambo 3.ham 4.ryan f 5.murphy 6.anil 7.sampson -90s 1.kirlew Barker left out due to being awol other wise spot number 1 2.hall 3.ackers 4.henderson 5.mitchel 6.waters
-100s 1.maiden 2.pickup 3.hall 4.dickenson 5.bubba 6.thomas
supers 1.big ste 2.marv 3.alan 4.ricketts 5.? 6.?
right arm only these are as close as i can get them if iam honest or were i think it would be Barker should be #1 in the 90s as we all know he's the best in that group (you've added Rambo in at 2nd in the 80s and he wasn't at NYC either...). | |
|
| |
Steve Kirlew pro
Posts : 527 Join date : 2009-11-15
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 15:46 | |
| I like this. We should have it online with profiles, stats and pics of each of the wrestlers in the league which is updated with up coming challenge matches etc. | |
|
| |
paul maiden pro
Posts : 629 Join date : 2008-12-08
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 15:55 | |
| Barker could be but his he still active and at the mo can he beat u? Terry? As for Rambo there has been 1 event since British and I do believe he got 2nd and really if we are doing a rankings we have be real apart from Craig who will be Rambo? | |
|
| |
Steve Kirlew pro
Posts : 527 Join date : 2009-11-15
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:00 | |
| - paul maiden wrote:
- 70s
1.ted 2.baz 3.dean 4.rogers 5.waters 6.shaw
-80s 1.craig 2.rambo 3.ham 4.ryan f 5.murphy 6.anil 7.sampson -90s 1.kirlew Barker left out due to being awol other wise spot number 1 2.hall 3.ackers 4.henderson 5.mitchel 6.waters
-100s 1.maiden 2.pickup 3.hall 4.dickenson 5.bubba 6.thomas
supers 1.big ste 2.marv 3.alan 4.ricketts 5.? 6.?
right arm only these are as close as i can get them if iam honest or were i think it would be From this list there are some great matches in each weight class... Even Craig in the 80 is being gained by Rod who is getting megga strong at the moment. I plan on beating Craig this year also. | |
|
| |
paul maiden pro
Posts : 629 Join date : 2008-12-08
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:03 | |
| But your not in Craig's class so Craig vs rod every time sounds fun | |
|
| |
Steve Kirlew pro
Posts : 527 Join date : 2009-11-15
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:04 | |
| - paul maiden wrote:
- Barker could be but his he still active and at the mo can he beat u? Terry?
As for Rambo there has been 1 event since British and I do believe he got 2nd and really if we are doing a rankings we have be real apart from Craig who will be Rambo? Yes Barker would beat us both. Terry might be beating him in training but competition is something completely different and as far as I can remember Terry's never beaten Barker in competition. | |
|
| |
Steve Kirlew pro
Posts : 527 Join date : 2009-11-15
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:06 | |
| - paul maiden wrote:
- But your not in Craig's class so Craig vs rod every time sounds fun
Yes but I can get under 80kg easily. In fact I'm probably there right now as I've been sick all week. So how does that work if I'm close to 80kg and want to challenge someone in the 80kg class? I suppose this will be an un-sanctioned event for no rankings just bragging rights. | |
|
| |
paul maiden pro
Posts : 629 Join date : 2008-12-08
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:11 | |
| Depends pal what class you want to be in??? 80s or 90s???? Or yes it wouldn't count so I guess if you choose 80s at the rampage it will be a title match perhaps like mine n Neil's don't forget there are weigh inns on day now too | |
|
| |
terryackers Admin
Posts : 467 Join date : 2008-06-30 Age : 42 Location : GREAT HARWOOD
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:12 | |
| Let just get it on put me where ever you guys want, ill be around the 90kg mark in next 8 weeks 94.6kg this morning.
Id put £500 cash id beat kirlew any time this year - over 6 at 90kg. | |
|
| |
paul maiden pro
Posts : 629 Join date : 2008-12-08
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:16 | |
| Ok tell il take that bet Powerbeck training day march 17th | |
|
| |
terryackers Admin
Posts : 467 Join date : 2008-06-30 Age : 42 Location : GREAT HARWOOD
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:17 | |
| | |
|
| |
Steve Kirlew pro
Posts : 527 Join date : 2009-11-15
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:19 | |
| - terryackers wrote:
- Let just get it on put me where ever you guys want, ill be around the 90kg mark in next 8 weeks 94.6kg this morning.
Id put £500 cash id beat kirlew any time this year - over 6 at 90kg. Haha here we go again. I hope you've got the money spare because you'd be loosing it. That being said I don't gamble. As part of the ranking system you'd have to beat Stu Hall first because he's in between me and you. | |
|
| |
terryackers Admin
Posts : 467 Join date : 2008-06-30 Age : 42 Location : GREAT HARWOOD
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:22 | |
| Ste , im not having a go pal. your strong id like to pull in a super match with you, i just dont think you will win. But time will tell if i can get to your class that is | |
|
| |
terryackers Admin
Posts : 467 Join date : 2008-06-30 Age : 42 Location : GREAT HARWOOD
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:24 | |
| Starting a new arm wrestling club Wednesday, hoping to get a steady few lads pulling weekly. | |
|
| |
paul maiden pro
Posts : 629 Join date : 2008-12-08
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:25 | |
| Kirlew will eat you up my £500 is waiting here Ste you up for it il give half my winnings to the church?? March 17th | |
|
| |
Steve Kirlew pro
Posts : 527 Join date : 2009-11-15
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:26 | |
| - terryackers wrote:
- Ste , im not having a go pal.
your strong id like to pull in a super match with you, i just dont think you will win.
But time will tell if i can get to your class that is Ok fair enough Terry. I'll have the match at some point this year with you. I don't know if the rule I mentioned really applies.. I think you can challenge anyone within 2 spots of you anyway but I guess the rules haven't been set. Good luck making the weight! | |
|
| |
Steve Kirlew pro
Posts : 527 Join date : 2009-11-15
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:26 | |
| - paul maiden wrote:
- Kirlew will eat you up my £500 is waiting here Ste you up for it il give half my winnings to the church?? March 17th
Hahahaha! | |
|
| |
terryackers Admin
Posts : 467 Join date : 2008-06-30 Age : 42 Location : GREAT HARWOOD
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:28 | |
| I'm really trying to eat correctly hoping that mite help the fat lad Cheers | |
|
| |
Steve Kirlew pro
Posts : 527 Join date : 2009-11-15
| |
| |
terryackers Admin
Posts : 467 Join date : 2008-06-30 Age : 42 Location : GREAT HARWOOD
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? Sun 4 Mar - 16:32 | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Rankings were are you?? | |
| |
|
| |
| Rankings were are you?? | |
|